Author Topic: The future of mankind  (Read 5603 times)

Karen Holmes

  • Karen Holmes
  • Administrator
  • Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31
    • Principal
The future of mankind
« on: July 28, 2016, 07:42:48 AM »
Our forum is conducting a poll about the future of mankind.

This is a time of great changes for the planet. We are facing major environmental crises. There is the rise of violent extremism. The global economies are in crisis.

If you could vote, which would you choose? 
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

Ganlenor

  • Guest
Re: The future of mankind
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2017, 02:17:38 AM »
Want to inquire about this information from where?

Karen Holmes

  • Karen Holmes
  • Administrator
  • Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31
    • Principal
Re: The future of mankind
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2018, 08:59:27 AM »
I am sorry it has taken so long to reply to your post. The forum has been deluged with spam, and it is difficult to filter out legitimate comments. I have neglected to reply to existing posts, but will now make an effort to respond more quickly.

Our organization started as the result of a prayer circle. Each week, a small group of us got together to pray for people in crisis, for events that were going on around the world, and for the planet. We prayed for peace. Then, we started to get answers to our prayers. We got spiritual gifts, and the spiritual hierarchy put the responsibility back on our shoulders. If we wanted world peace, we would have to create our projects that benefit everyone. We were taught how to bring world peace. Each of the group assumed responsibility for a project.
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

EricSel

  • Guest
Re: The future of mankind
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2018, 03:51:58 AM »
How would you fund those projects, Karen? What can we do to help?

Karen Holmes

  • Karen Holmes
  • Administrator
  • Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31
    • Principal
Re: The future of mankind
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2018, 08:50:07 PM »
Each of the projects will be funded first by each team member sharing talents and gifts. There will be income from the sales of our books. Half the income from each book will go to fund the projects. Then the projects will be offered to the world leaders through our advisory catalog, and our teams will contract with their governments.

For example, we have a script for a play that is a new genre in theater, because it consists of 22 half hour episodes and then scenes from the episodes will be selected to become a movie. It is a rags to riches story of a family that is facing a financial crisis, actual independent members who are facing the same crisis, and it carries the family all the way from crisis to living the life they all want. It will be a very low budget project. The project team will star in the episodes and sell the DVDs, and then it will be included in our advisory catalog. What is great about this project is that it can be considered a form of taxation, because the people who buy the DVDs are supporting the projects, but also learning how to create their life, and that allows third world nations--any nation--to bring in the income to pay for the other projects, too. Everyone benefits.

All of our projects must stand on the same principles. We don't sell our intellectual property, but anyone can take the spin off technologies and run with them. We are basically demonstrating the principles of the projects, and everyone project must stand on the same principles.   
The World Peace Organization for the One World Government

MartyThatt

  • Guest
The future of mankind
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2019, 06:00:12 PM »
I believe the Bible teaches that in the future the earth will become a paradise and an everlasting home for perfected mankind.

What do you guys think the future of the earth will be?

Instradoxy

  • Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
The future of mankind
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2019, 01:45:45 AM »
Its not possible to have freedom of religion without freedom from religion as a possibility. With out the possibility of freedom from religion, the government would have to define what is and what is not a religion. And that would be the end of freedom of religion.